Use case · review before merge
A session transcript explains what an agent attempted. Beeplane helps you return to that context; your Git diff, test results, and review process remain the source of truth.
This is a human review workflow, not an automatic approval system. Use the transcript to frame your review and the repository to verify what changed.
Confirm the goal, constraints, and commands the agent says it ran. Note any assumptions or unfinished work.
Review changed files and diffs with your normal Git tools. Compare the implementation with the original task and project conventions.
Use the project’s documented commands and check output directly. A transcript statement that tests passed is helpful context, not independent evidence.
Send a follow-up through Beeplane if you need the agent to explain or adjust something. Merge only after the code meets your usual review standard.
A transcript that explains agent intent alongside a review of the actual Git diff and test results.
Treating an agent’s report as proof that a change is correct or tested.
No. Beeplane exposes local agent sessions; it is not a Git hosting or pull request review service.
They show what the agent reported. Verify important results by running tests or checking CI yourself.
Yes, for supported sessions when the host is reachable and paired.
Free to download. Works with Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other agents on macOS or Linux.